The Issue:
Background:
Arguments for the Project:
They admit that shutting the highway down completely during construction will cause some headaches and be an inconvenience to thousands or commuters. However, they equate a complete shutdown with pulling a band-aid off quickly; the project will be finished faster, and ultimately be much less expensive.
And, the end result will justify the means. When the project is finally finished in 2010, it will be much easier and safer to get from downtown St. Louis to Clayton, Chesterfield and other suburbs. The expanded capacity will also potentially ease traffic on other major by-ways, such as I-70.
Arguments Against the Project:
Moreover, our dollars don't seem to be going very far. In many areas along the 10-mile stretch, the plan is to add one additional lane. Opponents argue that the additional lane will only buy us a couple of years of reduced traffic, and then we'll have to go through this process all over again.
Opponents add that an additional lane may help briefly, but it will actually encourage more urban sprawl as it becomes easier for people to live in outer suburbs. This will in-turn create more traffic, as well as adversely affect the already poor air quality in the St. Louis region. Opponents also point to stats showing the much higher dollars per household spent on providing highways (etc.) to suburban homes versus those closer to the city.
Finally, many businesses in the construction area, or simply served by I-64, have serious concerns about losing customers and having difficulties retaining good employees. Business and tourist organizations, especially, worry that national conventions and trade shows will bypass St. Louis during the two years that the highway is shut down, and may never look at St. Louis again.
Where it Stands:
However, the larger issue of urban sprawl is just getting traction, and this construction project will likely cause many suburban households to consider buying a home closer to the city, or finding a job closer to home. The impact on the city could be much greater than the minor inconveniences described by MoDOT.

